The common carp or Cyprinus carpio has pharyngeal teeth. The tooth count is 1, 1, 3-3, 1, 1 (Hubbs et al 1991). However, the count may be 1,2,3-3,2,1. The pharyngeal teeth are molar-like with flattened crowns. (Goldstein and Simon, 1999).
The origin of pharyngeal teeth in fishes has been open to debate. A paper written by Linden Edwards in May 1929 outlined the basic issue. “The idea of ectodermal migration to account for the presence of scales and teeth in the pharyngeal cavity of fishes is suggested in some text-books, the thought is implied in others that these structures could have been formed from endotherm in situ.” Edwards, Linden, The Origen of the Pharyngeal Teeth of the Carp (Cyprinus Carpio Linnaeus), The Ohio Journal of Science, Volume 29, May 1929, No.3.
Pharyngeal Teeth of Common Carp
Fresh water Cyprinids which include the common carp do not have teeth in their jaws. This is also true for the salt water genus Tribolodon found in the Bohai and Yellow Seas. “Carp have no teeth in their jaws, but have pharyngeal teeth (teeth in the throat cavity behind the mouth) that are broad and form three rows, with the inner rows acting to crush/grind their food. Because of this, the design of a Carp's mouth is not for chewing plants or other fish, but for crushing and grinding molluscs, seeds and algae.” (What is a Carp?) . “The fifth ceratobranchial is enlarged as the pharyngeal bone, with teeth ankylosed (joined) to it. For cyprinids, pharyngeal teeth are in one to three rows, and there are never more than eight teeth in any one row…” (Jiffynotes)
In 1982, F.A. Sibbing analyzed the structures that determine the movements of pharyngeal teeth and chewing pad in the carp (Cyprinus carpio. He says that the masticatory mechanism is still poorly understood. His view is that “Masticatory cycles are bilaterally synchronous and show distinct crushing and grinding patterns.”
The pharyngeal tooth remains of crucian and common carp from the Tinaluoshan site of the Hemudu Cultural Stage, Zhejiang Province, China have been studied by a group of scientists. They infer that Neolithic dwellers used gill nets to catch fish of a specific size during breeding season. Dwellers along the Yangstze River depended on fish as a major source of protein. Nakajima goes on to show the relationship between fish and rice cultivation.
There may be an image of a fish that is perceptible which has been created through an arrangement of boulders and carving on Fu Shan. The fish appears to be a common carp. However, it seems that the image has teeth in its jaw. If it is a common carp then it is a unique and uncommon common carp.
Goldstein, R.M., and T.P. Simon. 1999. Toward a united definition of guild structure for feeding ecology of North American freshwater fishes. pp. 123-202 in T.P. Simon, editor. Assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 671 pp.
Nakajima, T., Nakajima, M., Mizuno, T., Sun, G.-P., He, S.-P. and Liu, H.-Z. (2010), On the pharyngeal tooth remains of crucian and common carp from the neolithic Tianluoshan site, Zhejiang Province, China, with remarks on the relationship between freshwater fishing and rice cultivation in the Neolithic Age. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. doi: 10.1002/oa.1206
Sibbing, F. A. (1982), Pharyngeal mastication and food transport in the carp (Cyprinus carpio L.): A cineradiographic and electromyographic study. Journal of Morphology, 172: 223–258. doi: 10.1002/jmor.1051720208
http://www.ccmoore.com/pdfs/nutritional_information/what_is_a_carp.pdf
http://www.jiffynotes.com/a_study_guides/book_notes/grze_04/grze_04_00263.html
The most important image that may appear on Fu Shan is that of a mask-like face. The left and right sides of the mask are parallel with each other. The decline of the mountain from its peak forms the top of the mask which joins the two sides. The eyes of the mask are oval in shape. The nose is prominent. The mouth is long. Both are in proportion to the size of the mask. The mask conveys a sense of serenity and tranquility.
The mask may be divided into two parts. On the right appears a reptile that has crocodilian features. On the left appears a fish that has carp features—with one important exception—the fish has visible teeth.
The depiction of a mask may be an important aspect of
early Neolithic art as found on Seaman pottery. It is not uncommon to find what
may represent a mask(s) portraying a fish-face. This type of painting has both
fish and human-like characteristics and is called 人面鱼 “renminyu”.
On the above piece of Banpo pottery there is a complex painting of a fish-face. The face itself is round. Perhaps the various fins are also portrayed in their triangular shapes.
There are two triangular shaped, small “young” fish that are attached or in a dependent position to the side of the round head. They may represent ears or perhaps elaborate barbels. Each of the young fish is divided into three triangular shapes or parts.
There are two larger “adult” fish drawn below the
fish-face. They, too, are triangular in shape. They have tiny barbel-like feelers.
Their bodies are arched to swim in a circular pattern. The independent fish on the right seems to be swimming after the smaller fish and looking out for it. Their scales are drawn
to resemble nets. One might wonder if actual fish nets were designed to
resemble scales.
On this bowl there is a vivid fish-face drawn on the side. It is somewhat oval in shape with a small triangular shaped chin and triangular point on the top of its head. There are hook- like lines running from each side of the forehead. There are two large size fish attached to the jaw where the barbels might be located. It now senses the world through its two small fry.
There are dot features throughout the painting which may
represent hairs or scales. Perhaps the dots have a numerical significance in
terms of time. It looks like the following sequences are visible from the
bottom: a) 26 (13 +13), b) 2 (1 + 1), c) 24 (13 +11), d) 16 (8 + 8) and e) 12
(6 + 6). Letter a) would seem to be twenty-six
weeks or one half year. Each year divided into four parts of thirteen weeks. Letter
b) could be a multiplier to make one full year. Letter c) seems to be
twenty-four hours in a day. Are the odd number of hours or 13 and 11 significant? Letter d) is unknown. Letter e) most likely to be 12 months in a year
or could be 12 periods a day of two hours each.
D. Carlton Rossi
河北徐水釜山是真正的“黄帝合符之所”吗?
39° 6' 55.72" N
115° 25' 28.85" E
This photo is selected for Google Earth - ID: 42715160
October 19, 2011
Chinese Alligator by H.E. Rohde
Chinese Alligator
The author has now viewed a full version of photo ID 42715160 selected for Google Earth and taken by bao_tai vip. This is a high quality color version of Fu Shan. In this photo the middle animal is more clearly outlined. It appears more like an alligator. The size seems to be in proportion to the monkey on the left and fish on the right. The eyes of the three animals are in line. The base line of the three animals is roughly horizontal.
It may be that the bulging eyes are those of an alligator rather than a tortoise; although both animals are reptiles. The body would extend from the head with both the left and right side defined. If this animal is an alligator then this is rather surprising since alligators are not seen today in Hebei. However, they were present thousands of years ago in the swamps and near the old course of the river.
Before the East Han Dynasty the Yellow River flowed near Busan, Xushui, Hebei Province. At this geographically significant location it changed direction 90 degrees from the north to the east. If one poetically imagines that the Yellow River is a dragon then this might mark the beginning of the head of the dragon. It continued its flow to Tianjin and the Bohai Sea. See the map below where an arrow marks the bend in the river.
东汉以前的黄河故道显示,黄河曾在徐水釜山脚下折了个近乎九十度的弯,掉头东去,从天津的北边进入渤海。
The inclusion of an embedded image of an alligator in the face image may be of importance. The face image would now incorporate entire images of an alligator and fish. It is generally believed that the alligator (crocodile), fish and snake were prototypes of the dragon.
D. Carlton Rossi
Course change of Yellow River from Qin Dynasty (221-206 BCE) to Eastern Han Dynasty "Dong Han" (25-220 BCE)
The Yellow River
flowed through the Hebei Plains and emptied into the Bohai Sea during
most of Neolithic history based on studies of pollen, village sites and
ancient texts. However, it changed course due to the influence of East
Asian monsoons and also sediment build-up in the river because of
agriculture. During the period from 3650-3000 B.C. it flowed into the
Jiangsu Plains and discharged into the Yellow Sea. Significantly though
it changed course again around 2900-2200 B.C. when it reverted back to
the Hebei Plain. (Wang Qing 1993a, 1999b)
The Chinese Neolithic: Trajectories to Early States
Li Liu, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. 2004, p.29-30
The Cambridge History of Ancient China
Michael Loewe & Edward L. Shaughnessy, 1999, p. 30-31
Zhang Chi, The Discovery of Early Pottery in China
Course changes of the Yellow River from 2278 B.C.E. to 2001 A.D.
http://www.paulnoll.com/China/History/history-Yellow-River.html
Edward Schafer describes the Jiaolong as spiritually akin to the crocodile. It was most often regarded as a dragon, but sometimes it was man-like or like a fish. They were interchangeable.
"The etymology of the word jiao is obscure. It may have derived from the word kog which has more meanings than any other draconym according to Carr. The seven meanings are "1. aquatic dragon 2. crocodile; alligator 3 hornless dragon 4. dragoness 5. scaled dragon 6 shark and 7. mermaid."
D. Carlton Rossi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiaolong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saltwater_crocodile
http://marinebio.org/species.asp?id=187
魚之樂
The fish image sees me as I seize it.
It leaps free to break bonds that hold.
A bold bound upward does unfold.
Gold drops fall off of scales sunlit.
D. Carlton Rossi
http://nsgd.gso.uri.edu/hawau/hawauw93001/hawauw93001chap5.pdf
Common Carp and Salinity
The Common Carp can live in heavily silted water or clean streams. When these carp live in rivers they are in the slow flow sections. For example, the section of river after a bend might be suitable fit. If rains have swelled the river they may move into flooded fields to deposit eggs on submerged plants. Cyprinids—including the Common Carp are fresh water fish.
The Common Carp can tolerate salinity up to about 5%. Common Carp have been reported in brackish marshes with salinities up to 14 ppm in southern France (Crivelli 1981). However, the Common Carp species is rarely found in brackish waters because high salinities cause excretory problems and may interfere with water balance. (Panek 1987). “Asian strains start to spawn when the ion concentration of the water decreases abruptly at the beginning of the rainy season”. Common carp will move from brackish waters to fresh water when they spawn.
Whiterod and Walker has completed a study on the effect of salinization in the Murry-Darling Basin of Australia. It is titled “Will rising salinity in the Murray–Darling Basin affect common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)? In particular they studied the effects of high salt levels on the alien species of Common Carp which is the most common fish in the river system.
“Carp are moderately tolerant of salinity (direct transfer LC50: 11 715 mg L–1), particularly after slow acclimation (LC50: 13 070 mg L–1), but sub-lethal effects are evident at lower salinities. These include effects on osmoregulation (>7500 mg L–1), behaviour (7500–12 500 mg L–1) and sperm motility in mature fish (150–300 mm) (8330 mg L–1). Salinities in some Murray–Darling Basin wetlands already approach half seawater (17 500 mg L–1) and carp populations in these important nursery areas could be impacted through sub-lethal effects on adults and lethal effects on juveniles, eggs and sperm.”
Tribolodon is a salt water Cyprinid genus that is found in the Yellow and Bohai Seas. The species T. brandtii is anadromous which means that it is fresh water born, resides in salt water and returns to fresh water to spawn. The species hakonensis is both anadromous and/or river resident.
D. Carlton Rossi
http://www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies/Cyprinus_carpio/en
http://www.fish.state.pa.us/pafish/fishhtms/chap12minnows.htm
November 18, 2011
There can be seen a fish-face or 人面鱼 “renminyu” on the inside of what may be a lid. It may be that this was used to seal a funeral urn of a child’s remains. The inside rim of the lid has arrows and lines that may represent directions. The face of the fish is round. It has slit eyes, small nose and mouth. There appear to be two small fish to left and right of the face. The small fish on the right appears to have a pair of barbels or touch sensors. The face is resting on an oblong shape with ray-like sticks. Each stick is the equivalent of a human hair or a fish scale. The shape may represent the pectoral fin of a fish like a carp. There is a triangular shaped symbol above the face which may represent the dorsal fin of a fish. Underneath this face-fish there are two larger scaled fish to the left and right.
The face-fish image has a dual character. It is both human-like and fish-like. It may be a human face imposed on a fish or fish features connected to a human face.
In the second picture there are two fish and two nets that are prominent. The fish on the left has two bent sticks sticking out of the side of its head. The dorsal fin also appears at the top. However, it may be that this drawing can also be viewed upside down. Upright it appears sad and upside down it appears happy. It may be that it stands for a live and dead fish. A live fish is upright, but a dead fish is upside down.
The two nets indicate that they are used by two fishermen. There are triangular shapes at each corner of the nets which may be stone weights which symbolize the basic shape of fish and/or the upper and lower lip of a face. Note that on the human-fish face these triangular shapes appear together and touch at the apex of the triangles. If these are the lips of the face or perhaps larger fish then they would consume whatever fish were caught in the nets. Two corners of each net is grabbed by each hand to catch the fish. Since the nets are weighted then they would most likely be dropped or thrown.
The third picture of Banpo pottery appears to be an urn--perhaps for the burial of an infant. The mouth of the fish-face is composed of triangle upon triangle which may represent fish on fish. What was described earlier as resembling a pectoral fin also resembles a mouth. So the small mouth is within the big mouth which resembles in shape the mouth of the urn itself.
The two bent sticks coming out of the side of the head have small fish attached. The bent sticks might represent fish lines with hooked fish. Alternatively, they may represent stylized ears. The dark and light patterns on the two fish are also repeated on the face-fish.
Further signs of embedding may be evident on the face of the urn. The two fish symbols may represent eyes of a large fish-face. Of course, the two fish have eyes themselves. The dark triangular shapes on the forehead of the smaller fish-face might become the nostrils of the large fish-face. The mouth of the large fish-face is the long horizontal oblong shape.
One may hazard a guess as to what the sculptured shapes represent at the top of the forehead. Perhaps they represent the pharyngeal pointed teeth of a grass carp. They may be intended to dispel evil spirits. Functionally they may have been used to secure the lid with rope. Wouldn’t the pattern of the rope then resemble a square or round fish net depending on how it was tied? The wavy lines above the shapes may represent hair of a person or waves of water.
This piece of Banpo pottery is boat shaped to carry water. Perhaps the shape of the boat was inspired by a fish. A rope might be threaded through the eyelets to raise and lower the vessel into the water. These eyelets could be construed to resemble the eyes of a fish. The gaping mouth of the fish is represented by a fish net with sharp teeth at either side. It would be a case of a big fish catching smaller fish or a fisherman catching fish. The black teeth might also resemble smaller fish particularly when combined with the lighter triangles on the net.
D. Carlton Rossi
Beihezhuang village is 1.5 kilometers the northwest of Fu Mountain. There is a historical site called Beihe Mesa, where the Yellow Emperor reconciled with Yandi (a leader of a tribe). That’s how the village got its name.
Xie village is located about 3 kilometers to the east of the Fu Mountain and 1.5 kilometers to the southeast of Chiyou’s tomb (a leader of an old tribe). It was in Jie village that Chiyou was drawn and quartered upon sentence of the Yellow Emperor. So the village is called Jie village.
Fan village is approximately 4 kilometers to the southeast of Fu Mountain. It was the camp where the Yellow Emperor stationed troops. At first, the walls were fences, so the village was named Fan village (of tree, grass). The name was later changed into Fan village.
Big and Small Mou Mountain villages were originally 2.5 kilometers to the east of Fu Mountain. They were scattered about the two sides of Chiyou’s tomb. Through the textual research conducted by experts on historical relics, Chiyou’s tomb was found on Red Soil Hill which was supposed to be man-made. Chiyou temple was on the top of the hill. Bull was the totem of Chiyou’s tribe and Mou is a mimetic word for bulls. Later, the word developed into “mou”. In 1958, the two villages were moved to other places because of the building of the Pu River reservoir.
Dean Li Boqian's Dedication
The dedication was written for the Xushui Cultural Studies of Fu Mountain. The author is Li Boqian who is the Dean of the Sinian Period Civilization Research Center at Peking University and also former President of the School of Archeology and Museology.
Fu Mountain of the Xushui is the site where the Yellow Emperor unified totem. This was clearly recorded in many historical documents, stone tablet inscriptions and poems etc. "The Yellow Emperor once chased Xunyu in the north of China and unified totem on Fu Mountain”. This was recorded in the biographies of five emperors according to the Shiji.
Zizhi Tongjian written in the Song dynasty has it that “The Yellow Emperor unified totem on Fu Mountain which is in Wusui (Suicheng, in Xushui, was once called Wusui).
“Fu Mountain is in Ansu County. It is right here, on Fu Mountain, that the Yellow Emperor and leaders of other tribes unified their totem” as recorded in the 8th volume of the Annals of Baodingfu (written in the 7th year of Emperor Guangxu of the Qing dynasty). Mingshengzhi has it that “Fu Mountain is to the west of Ansu County town, about 40 li”.
“Fu Mountain, on which the totem was unified, lies like a pot some 45 li to the west of the County seat. The Yellow Emperor and other vassals unified totem on Fu Mountain which became one of the eight scenic spots” as recorded in the 9th volume, County Annuals of Ansu County written in the 13th year of Emperor Jiaqing in the Qing dynasty.
“Xuanyuanshi (the Yellow Emperor) visited places to know the customs and climbed Fu Mountain to assemble vassals to unify totem in the west of Xushui County. There is a Yellow Emperor platform standing on the top of the mountain, and its vestiges still exist”. This record is from the 10th volume, New County Annuals of Xushui County which was written in the 32nd year of the Republic of China.
In the Yanhuanghuidian (a history book) there is an essay written by Wangyuyou who was a scholar in the Qing dynasty. He wrote that “Fu Mountain, the place where the Yellow Emperor met other vassals to unify totem, has been a place of interest for a long time and it is a must to climb the mountain and ascend a height and look far into the distance.
A famous poet in the Qing dynasty also wrote a poem for Fu Mountain in Xushui. He wrote that “Unifying totem was an event in the old times. The spring is quite deep of itself. Taste the water and you will still be able to understand the intention of the Yellow Emperor”.
The Yellow Emperor temple was restored in the 13th year of Qianlong (1784 AD), Qing dynasty. When a stone tablet was installed, there were three poems engraved on it; namely, The Paean to the Yellow Emperor written by Caozhi in Three Kingdoms Period, Xuanyuantai by Chenzhengang in the Tang dynasty, On the Way to Suizhou by Wenqianxiang in the Song dynasty.
The Yellow Emperor
Pre-Painted
Pottery Culture, Painted Pottery Culture, Black Pottery Culture, and Xiajiadian
culture were unearthed not far from Fu Mountain. And Painted Pottery Culture
ancient ruins are found at the Wencun site, Jinjiafen site, Fangling site,
Beiheshouying site, and late Painted Pottery Culture site (the Xueshan First
Stage) in the Puhe area or altogether more than 46 sites. They existed
approximately in the same era as the Yellow Emperor’s, with a history of 5,000
years.
In Hebei
Province, only on Fu Mountain in Xushui, or in the north of Mancheng, did
people discover Han dynasty pictures and stone inscription. These can also be found elsewhere in Henan
province, Shandong province, the north of Jiangsu province and the north of
Shaanxi province. Han dynasty tombs and burial stones engraved with pictures
unearthed in Fu Mountain and areas around it were of large quantity, high
quality and rich contents. So we can see
the prosperity of Fu Mountain in the Han Dynasty. And it is easy for us to arrive at the
conclusion that there were many residents who lived around Fu Mountain which
was named when Sima Qian wrote the Shiji two thousand years ago.
From
September to October in 2008, when the archeological team from Hebei Research
Center of Cultural Relics excavated the groundwork of a temple, they found an
incomplete stone tablet in riprap, deeper than a meter beneath the ground. The
characters on the stele could still be read “The Yellow Emperor Unified totem
here … the dragon is prominent…”
According to the textual research, Long, which
means dragon, was a big family name in the Fu Mountain area. During the Qing Dynasty, in the 13th
year of Emperor Qianlong, the expenses needed to build the temple were
collected from some rich families whose surname was Long. Twenty years ago, a
Han dynasty stone door for a tomb engraved with a dragon was unearthed in
Wangkan village, near Fu Mountain. The stele and stone door for tombs engraved
with the dragon provided the research on dragon culture with text and definite
objects.
The fairy tales and folklores about the Yellow Emperor in Fu Mountain and the places around the mountain are the rich cultural heritage and essence of Chinese history of 5,000 years ago. Like places named around Fu Mountain mentioned above, these ancient myths, to some extent, reflect the shadow which is cast by history.
Various myths and legends have been a controversial topic in academic research all the time. As a matter of fact, like other peoples in the world, Chinese civilization has its own fairy tale and legends at the beginning. Because at that time, there were no characters to record and the best way to hand down civilization from generation to generation was speaking and listening. There are many fairy tales and folklores about the Yellow Emperor that spread among people on Fu Mountain and areas near it. For instance, the fight between the Yellow Emperor and Yandi at Banquan, the legend of drawing dragon and unifying totem on Fu Mountain, the banquet for vassals at the origin of Fu Mountain, a lady from Xiling who was good at weaving silk, the show of dragon lanterns on the eve of the Spring Festival, and so on. These myths are included in The Spectacular Scenic Spots in Xushui and the Records of Anecdotes about Fu Mountain and its surrounding areas. These records which were compiled respectively by Jinfengyun the former Vice-Chairman of the People's Political Consultative Committee of Xushui, and Yangzhonglin, a knowledgeable person, from Dawangdian, Xushui County.
There is much strong, evidence that has been unearthed to verify the legend of drawing dragon and unifying totem. It was said that when ancient ancestors from many tribes gathered to form alliances,they cut one part of their totems with typical characteristic to form a new one as a united totem which marked that there would be no war from then on. So everyone drew a stroke; consequently, a nondescript animal was created. Anyhow, what kind of name should it have?
Production and daily life endowed the ancient ancestors with almost infinite wisdom. All tribes living in the Yellow Emperor era were facing a new turning point from nomadic to an agriculture civilization. At that time, our ancient ancestors made cages with bamboo strips or flexible materials. These cages were used to lock in birds or other prey. Legend has it that after the creation of the nondescript animal, people had a swift imagination that since this special thing could bring all the totems together, let us call it “Longzi”(cage) which developed into “Long”(dragon). In the long period of history, the owner of Fu Mountain was always a family surnamed Long, which was a big family name. Until now, there are many people surnamed ’Long’ in several villages at the foot of the Fu Mountain. In 1978 and 1981, some stone reliefs engraved with the image of a dragon in the Han Dynasty were successively unearthed from tombs in the South Fu Mountain. The dragon had a long mouth and sharp teeth, beard in rhynchodaeum , horns on its head, crooked neck and beast body, an upturned tail and a pair of special wings on its back.
In 2008, an archaeological team dispatched by Hebei Research Center of Cultural Relics found an incomplete stone tablet carved with this statement “The Yellow Emperor unified totem here ….dragon is prominent...”In an historical aspect, it was not until late in the Shang dynasty, about a thousand years after the action of drawing dragon and unifying totem, that eight hundred vassals revolted in Mengjin, Henan Province. There had been no big war before. Ancient ancestors of all tribes raised the political wisdom to a kind of cultural spirit, and universal value through drawing dragon and unifying totem. From then on, the Chinese nation had a uniform totem of “Long” which started a new journey to civilization. China was called “Dragon of the Orient” and Children of China were called “Descendants of the Yellow” or “the Descendants of the Dragon”. In addition, there are many folk activities which are preserved in Fu Mountain village of sacrificing the Yellow Emperor on March 1st. The Yellow Emperor temple fair which is held annually on 1st of March on Fu Mountain is a good example.
Unifying Totem on Fu Mountain
The history of Xushui and its surrounding areas is without break, which confirms that the historical context of unifying totem on Fu Mountain has been continued and inherited.
Judging from the age of the remnants, Nanzhuangtou archaeological sites date back 10,000 years or so. Pre-Painted Pottery Culture, Painted Pottery Culture, Black Pottery Culture and Xiajiadian culture sites unearthed around Fu Mountain revealed a developmental process of thousands of years from the Yellow Emperor period to the Xia, Shang, Zhou dynasties, Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.
Beifudi prehistory cultural relics are located in Shenshi village, Gaochun town, Yi County, on a mesa bordering the middle of the north bank of the Yishui River. On this site, the cultural remnants of the three phases of Neolith Era were discovered, and these remnants were nearly in the same age as Ci mountain culture and Xinglongwa culture, about 8,000-years ago.
Qilizhuang village which is located 3 kilometers to the northeast of Yi County town belongs to the north bank of the northern Yishui River. In that village, cultural relics of five periods from the Neolithic Era to the dynasties of the Xia, Shang, Zhou, and the Warring States Periods were found. The significance of the ancient ruins lies in connection of the human activities with a history of 10,000 years in this place. The discovery was rare at home and abroad. As a result, it shocked archaeological circles.
When the archaeological team of Beijing City Research Center of Historical Relics carried out the rescue excavation of tombs in north Fu Mountain (traversed by projects for diverting water from the south to the north) they unearthed some implements buried with the dead. These implements consist of four main periods, namely, the Han, Tang, Song and Liao Dynasties and also the Ming and Qing. The dynasties span two thousand years. It indicated that this area was the main place of activities of our ancient ancestors.
On the 16th of July 1987, Zouheng and Liyangsong, famous archaeologists of China and Professors of Peking University, sang highly of historical relics in Xushui after making an on-the-spot investigation. “The ancient ruins discovered in Xushui County in our national survey of cultural relics are of large quantity and high quality. Furthermore, there is no break in the history of these ruins. They offered an approach to solve the difficult and perennial questions. Most importantly, some new academic subjects have been put forward”.
Jiajinbiao, a researcher of Hebei Research Institute of Cultural Relics, who graduated in his early years from the Department of Archaeology at Zhongshan University, has participated almost in all archaeological activities in Xushui County and has arrived at the conclusion that Xushui is one of the cradles of Chinese civilization.
East Subordinate Palace
At the foot of the Fu Mountain, there could once be found one of the bends of the old course of the Yellow River and also the inferential place where the Yellow Emperor unified totem.
After many year’s spot investigation and textual research conducted by historical geographers and departments of archaeology and cultural relics, the primary conclusion was drawn that “Unifying totem” on Fu Mountain was a kind of cultural phenomenon of the Yellow River and the Yellow Emperor laid the foundation for the reunification of the Chinese nation.
The Yellow River is the mother river of the Chinese nation. Along its river basin the Yellow Emperor led the tribes to the north and settled down where there was water and grass. Any study of the event of unifying totem conducted by the Yellow Emperor on Fu Mountain should be based on the Yellow River. Whoever breaks away from the Yellow River to seek the whereabouts of the Fu Mountain on which totem was unified, he equally vetoes the historical fact that the Yellow Emperor initiated the civilization of Chinese nation in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. In a word, the Yellow River is a touch-stone, and any study is valueless without the Yellow River as support.
Tanqixiang, a historical geographer, renowned as “WenhuaShenzhou(a poetic name for China)”(means a person who is the leading authority on historical geography) found an old course of the Yellow River called Shanjing River to have undoubtedly existed. The sketch of Shanjing river showed the Yellow River flowed from Xiaolangdi Dam, along the east foot of Taihang mountain, then, it ran northeastwards, running through places today called Anyang, Handan, Shenzhou, Gaoyang and turned sharply at the foot of the Fu Mountain. It flowed eastwards, traversing Anxin, Bazhou and Tianjin and into the Bohai Sea.
In the aspect of some related geological material, it is found that in prehistoric times water of the Yellow River flowed down. The water carried huge amounts of sediment and formed which formed the Hebei plain. After that the Yellow River still overflowed unceasingly. There were many gorges in the plain along the east foot of Taihang Mountain. This was the old course of the Yellow River, including parts of the gorges in Xushui County. Ivory fossils of Palaeoloxodon, about 4 metres long and 200,000 to 300,000 years old, were excavated around Fu Mountain.
More than 3,500 year-old pieces of Jomon pottery, building units of past dynasties, history books, and stone inscriptions have been unearthed at the site of the Yellow Emperor Temple on Fu Mountain. They furnished strong evidence to prove the fact that the Yellow Emperor unified totem on Fu Mountain in Xushui County.
The site of the Yellow Emperor Temple is located on the top of Fu Mountain. It is said that the temple was built by Emperor Shun in memory of the Yellow Emperor. The Yellow Emperor Temple suffered repeated destruction on more than ten occasions due to act of man, lightning strike, wildfires, and wars etc.
Xushui County annals said, Cuizhidao and others restored the Yellow Emperor Temple on the top of the Fu Mountain in the 25th year (1546 A.D.) of Emperor Jiajing, Ming dynasty. This was recorded in a tablet’s inscription.
According to the inscriptions on the incomplete tablets in the Ming and Qing dynasties that were found on the top of Fu Mountain, the Yellow Emperor Temple was rebuilt in the 13th year (1622 A.D.) of Emperor Chongzhen, Ming dynasty, destroyed in a wildfire in 12th year (1734 A.D.) of Emperor Yongzheng of the Qing dynasty and burned to pieces in the 10th year (1745 A.D.) of Emperor Qianlong. It was reconstructed in 1748, damaged in the 4th year (1878 A.D.) of Emperor Guangxu, and burned down again in 1900 A.D. It was told by the local old folks that the stone tablet on the top of the Fu Mountain was bombarded into pieces by Japanese invaders in the war of Japanese Resistance.
The archaeological team of Hebei Research Center of Cultural Relics excavated ancient ruins of the old temple and two upper sections of tablets were found. They referred to the “Rebuilding of the Temporary Palace in Tai mountain” and “the Tablet Inscription of Reconstructing the Temple of Goddess”. The work statement on the excavation of old temples says that the ancient ruins exhumed at this time were in the Ming and Qing dynasties. We not only unearthed the pieces of yellow glaze porcelain pot of the Tang dynasty and White porcelain of black flower in the period of Jin and Yuan in the courtyard filling in the top, but also pieces of Jomon potteries in the early Shang dynasty about 3500 years ago.”
The building units unearthed ranging from the Han, Tang, Song and Liao dynasties to the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, provide physical evidence for the fact that the Yellow Emperor Temple on the Fu Mountain experienced repeated destruction and sufferings.
Fushan Cultural Circle
More than 3,500 year-old pieces of Jomon potteries, building units of past dynasties, history books, and stone inscriptions have been unearthed at the site of the Yellow Emperor Temple on Fu Mountain. They furnished strong evidence to prove the fact that the Yellow Emperor unified totem on Fu Mountain in Xushui County.
The site of the Yellow Emperor Temple is located on the top of Fu Mountain. It is said that the temple was built by Emperor Shun in memory of the Yellow Emperor. The Yellow Emperor Temple suffered repeated destruction on more than ten occasions due to act of man, lightning strike, wildfires, and wars etc.
Xushui County annals said, Cuizhidao and others restored the Yellow Emperor Temple on the top of the Fu Mountain in the 25th year (1546 A.D.) of Emperor Jiajing, Ming dynasty. This was recorded in a tablet’s inscription.
According to the inscriptions on the incomplete tablets in the Ming and Qing dynasties that were found on the top of Fu Mountain, the Yellow Emperor Temple was rebuilt in the 13th year (1622 A.D.) of Emperor Chongzhen, Ming dynasty, destroyed in a wildfire in 12th year (1734 A.D.) of Emperor Yongzheng of the Qing dynasty and burned to pieces in the 10th year (1745 A.D.) of Emperor Qianlong. It was reconstructed in 1748, damaged in the 4th year (1878 A.D.) of Emperor Guangxu, and burned down again in 1900 A.D. It was told by the local old folks that the stone tablet on the top of the Fu Mountain was bombarded into pieces by Japanese invaders in the war of Japanese Resistance.
The archaeological team of Hebei Research Center of Cultural Relics excavated ancient ruins of the old temple and two upper sections of tablets were found. They referred to the “Rebuilding of the Temporary Palace in Tai mountain” and “the Tablet Inscription of Reconstructing the Temple of Goddess”. The work statement on the excavation of old temples says that the ancient ruins exhumed at this time were in the Ming and Qing dynasties. We not only unearthed the pieces of yellow glaze porcelain pot of the Tang dynasty and White porcelain of black flower in the period of Jin and Yuan in the courtyard filling in the top, but also pieces of Jomon potteries in the early Shang dynasty about 3500 years ago.”
The building units unearthed ranging from the Han, Tang, Song and Liao dynasties to the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, provide physical evidence for the fact that the Yellow Emperor Temple on the Fu Mountain experienced repeated destruction and sufferings.
The period of ancient characters (Yake characters engraved on cliff stones) of Fu Mountain was in accordance with the time when the Yellow Emperor unified the totem on Fu Mountain.
In 1978, Jinfengyun found 109 ancient characters in the caves of Fu Mountain. And recently, another 30 have been detected on the animal fossils around Fu Mountain and parts of characters in many other places. After expert speculation, they are considered as symbols left by the ancient ancestors in the times of the Yellow Emperor. Even now, these characters are indecipherable for anyone. Although difficult to know the purpose and contents of Yake, it is no doubt that characters engraved in stones are a kind of phenomenon prior to the real characters, earlier than hieroglyph and inscription on the oracle bones. Judging from the rich contents of the Yake, it is easy to know that ancient ancestors had powerful abilities of observation and imagination towards the nature.
Through the study, Yake in Fu Mountain share some of the same characteristics with symbols of prehistory unearthed before as well as signs inscribed in the ancient bronzes. It indicates that the cliff stones engraved with characters on Fu Mountain not only inherited the features of the Neolithic Age in Painted Pottery Period, but also continued to develop to the Bronze Age, and its inheritance is continuative. These engraved symbols date back to 5,000 ago and last until the early years of the Shang dynasty. The age when the ancient characters were carved in Fu Mountain was almost the same as the period of unifying totem done by the Yellow Emperor.
It is not an accident that the discovery of over 5,000-year-old ancient characters tallies the event of unifying totem performed by the Yellow Emperor on Fu Mountain. If these ancient characters could be deciphered, they might verify the fact that the Yellow Emperor unified totem on Fu Mountain.
Yake characters engraved in cliff stones on Fu Mountain
How to Find Fu Shan
Map #1 (English)
Map #2 (Chinese)
Chinese Search terms: 河北釜山地点位置
(Copy and paste these Chinese search terms into the English Google search bar)
Directions for Fu Shan from Xushui, Hebei
Fu Shan is located 27 km from Xushui, Hebei in a NNW direction. (Fu Shan is located 23 km from Dawu City in a NW direction).The Puhe Water Reservoir east water channel ends roughly at Yufeng Road in Xushui. On the map follow the channel in a NNW direction, cross the G5 Jin Kun Expressway, continue to follow the channel and you will arrive at the Puhe Water Reservoir. It is just east of the main mountain range.
Find the western water channel from the Puhe Water Reservoir. You will see a village just south of the bend in the western channel. The village is called Dongushanxiang or East Fu Shan village. There are actually four villages here. They have directional names. There is North (Bei or 北), South (Nan or 南), West (Xi or 西) and East (Dong or 东) Villages. Fu Shan mountain is located about 3 kilometers SW of Nan Fu Shan Village.
At this point switch to the satellite view at about one-half the scale. You will see the south water channel. Follow that channel in a SW direction. At the bend in the channel you will discover Fu Shan. It is a very short distance from the bend of the south water channel.
Guangming Daily
May 5, 2009
Shiji
(Records of the Historian) has the record that the Yellow Emperor
unified totem on Fu Mountain. The Yellow Emperor and representatives of
other tribes unified totem and made an alliance between them. After
that time, all the tribes whether big or small of the Chinese nation
were in the charge of the Yellow Emperor thereby initiating the 5000
year history of the Chinese nation.
Where is Fu Mountain on which the Yellow Emperor Unified Totem
The phrase ‘Unifying Totem on Fu Mountain’ stems from some related records in the Shiji (Records of the Historian). Simaqian who is the author of the Shiji, wrote in the Biographies of five Emperors, the first article of Shiji,
that the Yellow Emperor once unified totem on Fu Mountain. The
historian told how the totem, also named Fujie (a totem used in ancient
times) or Fuxin (a totem used to represent a pledge), was often made of
bamboo, wood, animal leather, jade or bones etc. The
totem was divided into halves carried by two owners as seals. Unifying
totem was a keepsake system of alliances before the creation of written
characters and it was very popular for a long time and applied to the
big political events, administration, ceremonies and military affairs. Fu
Mountain was the place where the Yellow Emperor and representatives of
other tribes unified symbol and made an alliance. After that, all the
tribes of the Chinese nation, big or small, were in the charge of the
Yellow Emperor, initiating the 5000 year history of the Chinese nation.
Zhangwenbin,
Executive Vice-Chairman of China Research Institute of the Culture of
the Yellow Emperor and Emperor Yan and who was also the former Director
of State Cultural Relic Bureau, said," Unifying
totem on Fu Mountain is an important turning point in the history of
the Chinese nation. From then on, the tribes developed into an alliance
of tribes, walking towards the fusion and unification of the Chinese
nation. It played an essential role in the formation and development of
the Chinese nation."
Some
experts also hold that Chinese unification started on Fu Mountain which
was the origin of the Chinese nation. Thereupon, to locate the position
of Fu Mountain and unveil the mystery of history is the goal for which
many experts and nongovernmental organizations are striving.
Opinions are widely divided on the location of Fu Mountain of unifying totem recorded in the Shiji (Records of the historian).The majority of the positions of Fu Mountain taken down in historical documents includes:
1. the Fu Mountain in Libao, a county-level city in Henan province
2. the Fu Mountain in Gaoping, a county-level city in Shanxi province
In
the past few years, Sun Dawu and his team have consulted a number of
historical books and scriptures, made on-the-spot investigations, and
invited experts to hold seminars validating the issue. Finally, they
came to the conclusion that it is probable that the event of unifying
totem on Fu Mountain took place on the Fu Mountain in Xushui County. In
October 2008, in order to conduct in-depth studies, Xushui Studies of
Fu Mountain Culture was set up and a book was compiled which was named The Beginning of the Yellow Emperor and Emperor Yan--the Inspection of Fu Mountain. The book explained the fact that the Yellow Emperor unifies totem on Fu Mountain in the following aspects: the shape of the mountain, places named after Fu Mountain, historical records, historical traces, and folk legends etc.
The
Fu Mountain is an isolated mountain located at the east foot of Taihang
Mountain, about 22.5 kilometers to the northwest of Xushui County town.
Fu Mountain got its name because it is like a
reversed pot. There are many records about the Fu Mountain in
historical documents. Zizhi Tongjian written in the Song dynasty has it that “The Yellow Emperor unified totem on Fu Mountain which is in Wusu. Suicheng, in Xushui, was once called Wusui ). Xushui County was once called as Ansu. According
to the records in the Annuals of Ansu (written in Qing dynasty) and the
New Annuals of Xushui County (written in the Republic of China),
Xuanyuan, the Yellow Emperor once visited places to know the custom. He
also killed Chiyou (a leader of a tribe) in the field of Zhuolu (a
county of Baoding city in Hebei Province).Then he climbed to the top of
Fu mountain and summoned the vassals to a unifying of the totem,
showing his prestige in Xushui County.
The
more than 46 ancient cultural traces discovered in the regions of
Xushui county provide to a great extent some strong evidences to prove
the fact of unifying totem on Fu Mountain.
In 1986, Liboqian,
a professor of the Department of Archeology, Peking University, and the
archeological team excavated the Nanzhuangtou Ancient Ruins to the due
east of Fu Mountain in Xushui County. There were a large number of
cultural relics coming to light, including, stone saddle-querns, stone
bars for millstone mill, bone stabbers, bone needles, a few dark-grew
potteries with sand marks, pieces of russet earthenware with sand
buckles, and some stone pieces. “I forgot the date of that day when the
first piece of pottery was discovered, but I can remember the time was
a quarter past ten in the morning.” When recalling the sight of more 20
years ago, Professor Liboqian is still very excited. “The excitement at
that moment was beyond words, because that piece of pottery was the
earliest piece we had discovered in North China Region.”
According
to evaluation, Nanzhuangtou ancient ruins are the earliest historical
sites of the New Stone Age in the North of China, about 9,700 to 10,500
years old. The Wencun, Jinjiafen, Suicheng, and Pu River ancient ruins
of Painted Pottery Culture and Black Pottery Culture were also found in
the regions around the Fu Mountain in Xushui County. They were in the
middle and late periods of the New Stone Age, roughly the same age as
the Yellow Emperor, dating back to 5,000 years ago. In these ruins,
pottery axes, pottery basins, pottery bowel, and pottery tripods with
three bulbous hollow legs were found, demonstrating a development
process of thousands of years from the epoch of the Yellow Emperor and
Emperor Yan, going through dynasties Xia, Shang, Zhou, to the Spring
and Autumn Period and Warring States.
In addition, there are many legends about the Yellow Emperor spreading among the folks in Xushui County; for instance, the Platform of Unifying Totem on the top or around Fu Mountain, the Temple of the Xuanyuan (represents carriage invented by the Yellow Emperor, so the Yellow Emperor is also called Xunyuan) Yellow Emperor, and the Cliff of the Yellow Emperor, etc. These legends, to some extent, reflect the blurry shadow cast by history.
Although
there are historical records, archaeological discoveries and folk
legends, experts still take a deliberative attitude towards the
achievement accomplished by the non-governmental organization. They hold
that the location of Fu Mountain needs further investigation.
Zhangwenbin
thinks that Xushui Studies of Fu Mountain Culture ought to focus on the
deep study, arrangement, and analysis of historical old scriptures and
documents. Do
not pay much more attention to the records of the Qing dynasty. These
records can only be regarded as your references. The older the records
are, the more valuable they can be. So you should hunt for the
historical records between the Han dynasty and Tang Dynasty, and then
sort them out completely.” Mr. Zhang also suggests that Hebei Research Institute of Cultural Relics should attach more importance to Xushui and do some further archaeological work. "It
is not possible that the Fu Mountain is isolated, and there must be
more valuable things for us to discover. I conjecture that the mystery
of Fu Mountain will be unveiled one day."
However,
the work of Xushui Studies of Fu Mountain Culture gets its universal
recognition as an attempt of folk strength participating in the study
of ancient culture.
“Personally
speaking, we should take different approaches to study Chinese ancient
civilization. On one hand, we can rely on the scholars. On the other
hand, we should depend on people from all fields of the society, who
are interested in Chinese ancient culture”.
Acting as the present dean of Peking University’s Sinian Period Civilization Research Center and a consultant of Sun Dawu’s team, Liboqian is presiding over the
Project of Tracing to the Source of Chinese Ancient Civilization. He
believes that in a sense we should carry forward Chinese ancient
spirit, meanwhile, develop Chinese ancient culture, and the latter is
more important because it connects all aspects of the society. “Xushui
Studies of Fushan Culture had better give priority to the collection,
arrangement and protection of the non-material things, such as folk
legends, etc. And the archeological departments should be responsible
for the clearing of the ancient construction sites. Both can accomplish
study in a cooperative manner without coming into conflict.”
Non-governmental
promotion has achieved successful results. Xushui County Party
Committee and government attatches great importance to the study of Fu
Culture, and takes it as a great event. At the
same time, actively do a lot of related work of protection, management,
and utilization on historical culture sites. The Fushan historical
ruins has also been made a major historical and cultural site under state protection of Xushui County.
Zhangwenbin
speaks frankly, “Now there are many places claiming to be the Fu
Mountain. It is impossible for the cultural relics departments and
culture departments to devote so many efforts to verification. We must
depend on the local party committees, governments, and folk strength to
promote and participate in the issue through combing with experts from
academia.”
Various
myths and legends have been a controversial topic in academic research
all the time. As a matter of fact, like other peoples in the world ,
Chinese civilization has its own fairy tale times and legend times at
the beginning . Because at that time, there was no characters to record
and the best way to hand down civilization from generation to
generation was speaking and listening.
Zhangwenbin
states clearly that we can not take the national nihilistic attitude
toward the myths and unifying totem on Fushan which just rely on the
legends. Nor can we be absolutely affirmative. Instead, as for fairy
tales and historical mysteries, we should consciously conduct research with a scientific attitude.
Most importantly, the Shiji (Records of Historian)
has a high credibility. Both the excavation of the Yin Ruins in Anyang,
Henan Province and the bronze inscriptions unearthed in Tianma ancient
ruins in Shaanxi Province are fairly accorded with the records in
Shiji. “This also shows that Simaqian (the author of Shiji) actually
maintained meticulous scholarship. The topic of unifying totem on Fu
Mountain is worth our continuative further study.” says Zhangwenbin.
From
the point of view of Chengguangquan, Vice Dean of the School of
Philosophy and Sociology of Beijing Normal University, the greater
significance of researching the culture of Fu Mountain is to continue
the cultural memory of the Chinese nation.“There
exists a viewpoint in the international academic circles that peoples
are a kind of imagined communities”, says Chengguangquan. “This
imagination is not fancied, but based on a kind of social fact. The
social fact is national identity, including psychological identity and
linguistic identity”.
Mr.
Cheng also thinks that in the age of globalization, a people will be
flooded by the time if it does not have its own historical context and
characteristics. “If we want to strengthen our national cohesion, we must
do an important job to continue our national memory.” But the reality
is that it is pretty difficult to fix up in a short time the history
through archaeology between 5,000 B.C and 3,000 B.C. So
it is a great significance for the present development of the Chinese
nation to collect and arrange our national memories; such as, myths and
legends which have come down from that period.
Chengguangquang reminds us that “With the changes of modern society, some of these memories will break off, and some even vanish.” “It is necessary to do more such work as the study on Fu Mountain culture to continue our national memory, allowing the Chinese nation to further establish its position in the world’s nation community in the present atmosphere which stresses identity.